Usually because they’re either lazy or don’t know any better.
Especially if it’s glucky.
Wow. Talk about having an opinion.
There’s not much I can suggest to the lazy author, both this experiment and the next offer some ways to for non-lazies to get information to the author in a way which keeps the reader engaged and the story moving forward.
Take part in a RoundTable 360°
Think I’m onto something? Take a class with me or schedule a critique of your work.
Think I’m an idiot? Let me know in a comment.
Either way, we’ll both learn something.
Get copies of Empty Sky and follow along.
For that matter, pick up several dozen copies of all my books because it’s a nice thing to do, you care, and I need the money.
I like your explanation about exposition versus dialogue. It’s a classic show-don’t-tell, with a solid dialogue description in your story. I like how you create a sense of setting as the characters perceive their surroundings. You show a dead man with money, dragged from the water. There is no exposition on the son tempted by the money. You instead write a banter between the two characters, with a lesson learned and a threat of demise by keeping the cash.
You do a nice job writing language with dialect and mannerisms within the dialogue to show the character.
Bless you!